Adapting the FAIR-enabling data policy checklist for repositories Workshop

10 December 2025 14:00–16:00
Online

FIDELIS’ Transparent Trustworthy Repository Attributes Matrix (TTRAM) highlights policies and standards as key repository functions and activities. In recent years, policy makers at various levels have been working to ensure that their policies support the creation and reuse of data that are findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR). The FAIRsFAIR project released their FAIR-enabling data policy checklist in 2022 to help policy makers self-assess whether elements of their data policies are FAIR-enabling as well as providing recommendations on what should be addressed when developing new data policies. 

While the checklist was originally intended to support the development and refinement of policies by research performing organisations and funding bodies, we believe there is potential for the checklist to be adapted for use by repositories seeking to demonstrate that they are FAIR-enabling. In this interactive session, the main aim will be to introduce the policy checklist to participants, to consider the range of policies that repositories may need to review, and to work collaboratively towards a first draft of an adaptation of the checklist to support its use by repositories.

Following the workshop, there will be an opportunity for interested participants to continue to feed into the adapted checklist and all contributors will receive credit as co-authors on the resulting publication.

Register for the Workshop

Adapting the FAIR-enabling data policy checklist for repositories Workshop

Agenda

TimingAgenda TopicSpeaker
14:00Welcome and aimsJoy Davidson, DCC
14:05Overview of the FAIR-enabling data policy checklist elements Joy Davidson, DCC
14:25Review of range of repository policiesLaurence Horton, DCC
14:40

Practical exercise instructions:

Working in small groups, participants will work through the FAIR-enabling data policy checklist to identify which elements are relevant to repositories and whether adaptations may be needed to the descriptors. Participants will also be asked to consider any additional checklist elements that may be missing.  

Each group should nominate a rapporteur to provide a brief summary on:

The potential usefulness of the checklist for repositories 
Changes or adaptations that would be needed 
Gaps in the checklist elements
 

Moderators:
Joy Davidson - group 1

Laurence Horton - group 2
 

14:45Group workAll
15:15Short break 
15:25Group workAll 
15:40Feedback from groups 
Each group should nominate
 
15:55Wrap up and next stepsJoy Davidson